The Context Audit: why your team's AI tools aren't landing
Your team has AI licenses and nobody's using them. That's not a training problem. It's a context problem.
Read the post →If you're new to AI building, do not start with model comparisons. Start with the loop.
scope → spec → build → diff-review → verify → ship → write up. The same loop runs every project on the site.
Seven steps. Repeat for every tool.
If you only read three things on this site, read these.
Your team has AI licenses and nobody's using them. That's not a training problem. It's a context problem.
Read the post →A dozen public builds, one repeatable workflow underneath. The map from the builds to what the course teaches.
Read the post →Anthropic's own guidance is to keep CLAUDE.md short. Bloated files drag every conversation down. The 2026 lightweight pattern.
Read the post →The scope filter pressure-tests your idea. The harness gives you the operating files. Both are free.
Seven questions. Pick the lane, name the v1 cut line, copy a draft AGENTS.md you can commit. Five minutes, no email required.
Live toolThe agent harness Vince uses on his own projects. AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, five slash commands, plus an optional 60-second Loom take on your idea.
Free downloadThe harness gets you started. After that, the right next step depends on whether you want structure, private help, team delivery, or more reading.
Four live weeks, one shipped tool, a Skills library you own. Best if you want fixed dates, group momentum, and a finish line.
1:1 coaching for operators, PMs, consultants, and founders. Same workflow, your schedule, async help between calls.
Project-based consulting for messy workflows, AI prototypes, and agent systems that need to become usable.
Short, opinionated essays on applied AI, agent workflows, and what makes Claude Code stick inside teams.
Seven steps, repeated for every tool. Start by pressure-testing the idea, then drop the harness into a fresh repo and ship.
Run the scope filter